|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |

Markus Lionum
Ministry of War Amarr Empire
1
|
Posted - 2015.11.27 20:05:12 -
[1] - Quote
Great freaking job CCP are you insane putting links on grid? You are killing solo pvp for alot of people if you implement this!!  |

Markus Lionum
Ministry of War Amarr Empire
1
|
Posted - 2015.11.27 20:26:51 -
[2] - Quote
Titus Heldane wrote:Markus Lionum wrote:Great freaking job CCP are you insane putting links on grid? You are killing solo pvp for alot of people if you implement this!!  i hope this is a troll post
and you are corect.
I for one, as a enthusiastic sport pvp'er in FW areas, welcome this change with open arms. Been playing since 2008 and hated OGB since day 1 I pvp'ed.
Latelly i started fielding a gnosis with T1 links - even with that I felt OP and I will hapilly give it up as long as every1 else does the same. |

Markus Lionum
Ministry of War Amarr Empire
1
|
Posted - 2015.11.28 09:31:08 -
[3] - Quote
Crosi Wesdo wrote: ..............
I remember you - you doing tha ghei maulus thing for years now - you had your fun now move on or go shoot the jita monument.
Your tears fills my soul with joy. |

Markus Lionum
Ministry of War Amarr Empire
1
|
Posted - 2015.11.28 13:27:11 -
[4] - Quote
Crosi Wesdo wrote:
And apologies
Apologies accepted |

Markus Lionum
Ministry of War Amarr Empire
1
|
Posted - 2015.12.05 11:10:07 -
[5] - Quote
Get over it link boy. You will have to learn to pvp properly or go mission it out in high sec |

Markus Lionum
Ministry of War Amarr Empire
1
|
Posted - 2015.12.05 21:07:32 -
[6] - Quote
Crosi Wesdo wrote:Markus Lionum wrote:Get over it link boy. You will have to learn to pvp properly or go mission it out in high sec From the guy with 100 kills in over half a decade lol. There really should be a filter on this forum that checks people actually pvp before they are allowed to comment on pvp lol. The number of non-forum alts with strong opinions on pvp with no combat record is astounding. In reality, what i will have to do is just blob up to fight blobs since taking other options away leaves less choice for engagement styles.
Your tears are sweet. But you will man up and blob in return so is all good
You sir are more risk adverse than a fresh starting pvp'er that pays for his ships / account with his RL food money, should stop preaching to people about what pvp is about |

Markus Lionum
Ministry of War Amarr Empire
1
|
Posted - 2015.12.07 05:03:50 -
[7] - Quote
Crosi Wesdo wrote:
Luckily, i have a friend who flies off grid links for me so some of your major arguments are mute in my case.
Bullshit lol |

Markus Lionum
Ministry of War Amarr Empire
1
|
Posted - 2015.12.07 05:32:13 -
[8] - Quote
Crosi Wesdo wrote:Prove me wrong. Seems like a large part of the anti-ogb argument revolves around paranoia and distrust :p
yeah I got it you were trolling all along, the tears are still salty and well preserved tho |

Markus Lionum
Ministry of War Amarr Empire
1
|
Posted - 2015.12.07 05:40:20 -
[9] - Quote
500mn officer t3 with 3xlinks will be possible for under 1,5b I dont see the big problem about links.
What you are complaining about are specific details, crashing plexes with your t1 faction/pirate frigate wich is ghei since its frigate pvp, but calling it ghei its just my oppinion and maybe another 90% of people involved in that kind of pvp |

Markus Lionum
Ministry of War Amarr Empire
1
|
Posted - 2015.12.07 06:08:39 -
[10] - Quote
Crosi Wesdo wrote:
See a gang in a plex and you dont have an evenly capable gang? Well, write it off, no combat for either side. You enter a different plex and they dont fancy risking a brawl at the warp in? Thats 2 plexes with no combat.
If you think links on grid will translate into less fights you are way off, on the contrary
its not the perfect change, imo perfect would be limiting warfare module on every ship at max 1 along with putting them on grid with increasing boost % depending on the hullor taking them out the game for good
this announced change forces linkers to be more tactical with the fit and possitioning, putting (a little) more risk than before on their boat, while totally screwing over the honest hard working l33t plex crashing frigate pilots. Also similar to other games it gives the advantage of those on the higher ground over those trying to capture the hill - wich makes total sense |
|

Markus Lionum
Ministry of War Amarr Empire
1
|
Posted - 2015.12.07 06:32:26 -
[11] - Quote
Crosi Wesdo wrote:So you reject my points with baseless assertions then back up my points with a reference to high ground advantage?
Most people who use boosts already have extremely tactical fits, the changes will just reduce engagement envelopes for a great number of people. Suggesting that it will not have a cooling effect on PVP when the effect is narrower envelopes is quite obtuse.
Gangs that dont have boosts will still not have boosts, but gangs generally engage smaller numbers regardless. Im just pointing out those people willing to engage gangs in smaller numbers will thin out a little.
Finally, seems you are angry about plex crashing frigates, if you are happy that this change will be a fix to that edge case while any other benefit is subjective or baseless then i have to question if your perspective is of any value at all and not just bitterness?
its not that im specifically angry about frigates crashing plexes, but you are the only zealot here defending links as they are and your reason is purely because it will affect your frigate plex crashing. anything else you mention is bullshit.
Then you use ambigous and abstract wording to dilute that bs
And you bet im bitter - I've been bitter about links for years |

Markus Lionum
Ministry of War Amarr Empire
4
|
Posted - 2015.12.08 22:26:59 -
[12] - Quote
Estella Osoka wrote:Jhousetlin Zamayid wrote:Lotta debate in this thread.
Here is my opinion regarding ECM and OGB:
If the only solution is to "bring your own", then there's probably a balance problem. It's not a balance problem. Balance is between 2 people. 1 versus 1. OGBs are 2 versus 1. Unfortunately, the kill report doesn't show that accurately.
Problem really is in how little input, focus and risk running links involves - call it balance or something else |
|
|
|